Diamanium Thinkers

Hybrid Threats and Proxy Warfare: Emerging Challenges to Pakistan’s National Security


Pakistan Faces combined threats of multiple nature including insurgency, cyber security, political disinformation, political instability and economic instability. Balochistan province remains one of most volatile area in the country, terrorist attacks surged, fatalities nearly doubled in 2025 and Pakistan toped the 2026 Global Terrorism Index. These converging activities demand not only the integral national response but also an effective “Peace and Conflict” strategy beyond the conventional military deterrence.

Key Points

  • Pakistan ranked first on the 2026 Global Terrorism Index, recording its highest terrorism deaths since 2013.
  • Balochistan fatalities rose 98 percent in 2025, driven by militants’ coordinated operations.
  • CPEC infrastructure and Chinese nationals remain priority targets for insurgent and proxy sabotage campaigns.
  • Cross-border cyber and disinformation operations increasingly target Pakistan’s institutions and social cohesion.
  • Countering hybrid threats requires integrating security, economic resilience and information-domain strategies together.

Conceptualising Hybrid and Proxy Warfare

Hybrid warfare or the 5th generation of the tactical warfare blends traditional force, irregular tactics, technological intrusion, harsh economical traps to achieve the political economical aims while not escalating the threat ladder that would trigger a physical war. Proxy war is an instrument allows the perpetrator states to intervene in to other states through non-state actors while maintain the neutrality in the international system. In case of Pakistan Geography plays crucial role in shaping security parameters, positioned between an unresolved Afghan border and old rival India on the east, this blended threat environment has become the dominant mode of confrontation rather than the exception.

The Militant and Insurgent Dimensionn

The overall fatalities in Balochistan have surged by around 98 percent from 774 in 2024 to 1,534 in 2025, including civilians, security personnel, and militants, according to data gathered by the South Asia Terrorism Portal. The Global Terrorism Index 2026 has ranked Pakistan first in the world for the first time for 1,139 incidences and 1,045 deaths in 2025. The attacks in late January 2026 in at least nine districts of Balochistan suggest a greater tactical sophistication on the part of the Baloch insurgents, including the use of a female suicide bomber against a paramilitary installation in late 2025. The analysts are increasingly referring to tactical convergence between separatist organisations and terrorists’ cells, which poses a challenge for counter insurgency efforts as it combines ethno-nationalist and jihadist goals.

Table 1: Selected Insurgency and Terrorism Indicators, Pakistan (2024–2026)

Indicator20242025Early 2026
Balochistan fatalities (SATP)7741,534120 (first 25 days)
Balochistan terrorist attacks (PIPS)~202254Ongoing surge
National terrorism deaths (GTI)Lower1,139NA
Global Terrorism Index rankTop 51stNA

Sources: South Asia Terrorism Portal; Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies; Global Terrorism Index 2026, Institute for Economics and Peace.

The Cyber and Information Domain

Pakistan’s cyber security domain is shaped both by offensively and defensively by resource constraints. Fragmented government policies, limited technical infrastructure and shortage of the skilled personnel leave critical systems exposed. While the enemy is heavily invested in the cyber domain with major investments in the field of AI and cyber technology. Targeting of Chinese personal in the Balochistan linked to the data leaks by the Pakistani side, these activities can hinder the progress of the CPEC in Pakistan, and can build an atmosphere of mistrust and security concerns for the Chinese government.

Economic and Infrastructure Targeting

Proxy campaigns in Balochistan increasingly priorities economic disruption. Insurgent groups strategically target the civilian infrastructure inside Balochistan, runs a defamation campaigns against the State authorities, they intentionally threat the foreign firms and target their convoys, sea ports like Gwadar and mining sites and Chinese personnel linked to CPEC project. These attacks are funded by the hostile states to coincide with the new investments in the region, including the roughly 1.3 billion-dollar Reko Diq mining project. These attacks lower the investor’s confidence, that has strategic cost on Pakistan’s economic and geo economic trajectory while maintain the operational deniability a classic feature of hybrid and proxy warfare.

Table 2: Categories of Hybrid Threats Facing Pakistan

DomainPrimary Actors / MethodsIllustrative Manifestation
Kinetic-proxyTs, BMOsCoordinated multi-district attacks, suicide bombings
CyberState and non-state actorsIntrusions on critical infrastructure, sub-threshold ops
Information / disinformationCross-border narrative campaignsSocial media manipulation, narrative shaping
Economic coercionThreats to CPEC and foreign investorsTargeting of Chinese nationals, mining and port projects
Diaspora / transnationalCovert state-linked operationsExtraterritorial plots and diplomatic fallout

Policy Implications

The convergence of these pressure shows that treating insurgency, cyber penetration and strategic economic sabotaging hurt the state sovereignty. For this a national level policy against the hybrid threat is required. We can overcome few of the threats by addressing their root causes, lasting stability also demand the attention to the structural violence. This include the long-standing local level issues and grievances in Balochistan and parts of KPK, political marginalization, inequitable distribution of the resources and forced disappearances are the contributing factors that marginalized people get in touch with the insurgent groups. This needs attention from the state and security officials. Conflict transformation approach emphasize on the inclusive governance, dialogue and negotiation between conflicting parties and major stakeholders. Confidence-building measures, greater provincial autonomy in resource management and transparent mechanisms for accountability can help reduce the legitimacy of armed groups. Without integrating these soft-power and justice-oriented dimensions alongside hard security measures, any response risks remaining reactive rather than transformative.

Conclusion

Pakistan’s security landscape in contemporary time is less defined by the conventional warfare than by a multidimensional hybrid contest. Record terrorism fatalities and an active Baloch insurgency intertwined with the terrorists’ network. Hybrid warfare is multilayer challenge that require credible resource allocation to the cyber security infrastructure and skill development. Stability in the government and economic resilience for the sustained regional diplomacy, recognising that internal cohesion is now as central to national security as external defence.

* Sheikh Eilaf Tariq is a Research Intern at Diamanium Thinkers, holding a Bachelors degree in Peace and Conflict Studies. His research interests include conflict dynamics, regional security, and South Asia–Middle East strategic affairs. He brings fresh practitioner insight and academic rigor, combining hands-on engagement with state institutions and strategic expertise grounded in research. He can be reached at jahanzaibdgc@gmail.com.

References

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top